Now for a more down-to-earth post
Mar. 19th, 2008 02:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, the last post was the happy, preeny post, (and you all are great with the congratulations and whatnot!!! *hugs you guys*), and now a bit of a reality check. heh.
I'm *almost* done with this thing (as done as it's gonna get for the thesis part of thesis-writing, and gradumacation). I will be turning it in sometime next week.... EEEEE. However, I'm not yet happy with the first chapter, which had to get rewritten quite extensively and is still not there, and the whole thing needs hammering, some characters need to be more realized, and subplots could do with a go over. Some of this will get done before I turn it in, and some of it not. I'm happy with it, though. There are bits that I love, and much I don't, but that's how it goes, and yay.
Also, I always get this note from instructors re: my original fiction. The "What is this about?" note (meaning, theme, I guess) and I'm always blindsided by the question because I'm like, "well, it's about what it's about!" (duh). But they're quite insistent about this -- and I can't really argue with it. A story needs to answer the question "What is this about?"
I'm thinking this is a handicap I have in my writing, largely because I write from character, and relationships and really hardly pay attention to theme. To me, the answer to the question is that it's about these characters. I never write from theme. I don't need a theme, to write. And many times a theme pops up, but usually it's sort of an accident, or something that develops naturally. Possibly this is because I started writing fannishly first, before original fiction? And with fan fiction, I'm all about the relationships.
Anyway, so, here's a poll:
[Poll #1157097]
I'm *almost* done with this thing (as done as it's gonna get for the thesis part of thesis-writing, and gradumacation). I will be turning it in sometime next week.... EEEEE. However, I'm not yet happy with the first chapter, which had to get rewritten quite extensively and is still not there, and the whole thing needs hammering, some characters need to be more realized, and subplots could do with a go over. Some of this will get done before I turn it in, and some of it not. I'm happy with it, though. There are bits that I love, and much I don't, but that's how it goes, and yay.
Also, I always get this note from instructors re: my original fiction. The "What is this about?" note (meaning, theme, I guess) and I'm always blindsided by the question because I'm like, "well, it's about what it's about!" (duh). But they're quite insistent about this -- and I can't really argue with it. A story needs to answer the question "What is this about?"
I'm thinking this is a handicap I have in my writing, largely because I write from character, and relationships and really hardly pay attention to theme. To me, the answer to the question is that it's about these characters. I never write from theme. I don't need a theme, to write. And many times a theme pops up, but usually it's sort of an accident, or something that develops naturally. Possibly this is because I started writing fannishly first, before original fiction? And with fan fiction, I'm all about the relationships.
Anyway, so, here's a poll:
[Poll #1157097]
no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 10:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 10:34 pm (UTC)For example, I wrote Eclipse to explore Methos' relationship with lunar eclipses over time, how his attitude toward the phenomenon has changed, and how it hasn't.
It is more complicated than that, of course, and certainly pairings and plot have a hand in my writing, and thematic elements are always present -- but they tend to grow out of the writing, rather than being the impetus for it.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-19 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-20 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-20 01:14 am (UTC)just my 2 cents!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-20 02:26 am (UTC)